FINAL REPORT

Suggested citation: Burns, G. 2022. South Bay Salt Pond Waterbird Surveys: September – May 2022. Report prepared for the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project.

Executive Summary
This report serves as a data summary and coarse-scale assessment of waterbird and water quality monitoring efforts at six pond complexes in the South San Francisco Bay. Coyote Hills, Dumbarton, and Mowry salt ponds are owned by Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge and managed for salt production by Cargill Salt. Alviso and Ravenswood complexes are owned and managed by Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Eden Landing Ecological Reserve (Eden Landing) ponds are owned and managed by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), with the exception pond CP3C, which is owned by Cargill Salt. This report is based primarily on data collected by the San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory between September 2021 and May 2022. 

The purpose of this ongoing study is to describe avian use of ponds to guide regional waterbird conservation, management, and habitat restoration efforts. The South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project (SBSPRP) is restoring 15,000 acres of former salt evaporation ponds to a mix of tidal marsh and ponded wetland habitats. As the SBSPRP proceeds, understanding how waterbirds use ponds, identifying key habitat associations, and incorporating features essential to pond-dependent species into restoration plans will be increasingly important to maintain baseline numbers of waterbirds in the South Bay.

From September 2021 – May 2022, we conducted waterbird surveys and water quality sampling at 82 ponds (22 Cargill-managed salt production ponds and 60 SBSPRP managed ponds). We examined species richness, abundance, and behavior of waterbird assemblages within and among pond complexes. We grouped species into guilds (e.g., dabbling ducks, diving ducks, gulls) based on foraging methods and prey requirements to understand waterbird use of these ponds. We also put these waterbird counts in the context of long-term trends to assess changes in waterbird numbers relative to baseline counts from before marsh restoration.

We recorded 1,248,069 waterbird observations of 78 species (all sites combined). The Alviso and Eden Landing pond complexes supported the greatest species diversity and Alviso had the highest abundances of all complexes. The abundance of 6 out of 10 species/guilds has increased in SBSPRP ponds since prior to restoration activities in 2005 – 2007. Exceptions comprise phalaropes, Bonaparte’s gulls, dabbling ducks, medium shorebirds. Bonaparte’s gull counts declined by 84% which exceeds the threshold of a 50% decline in a single year.

As the SBSPRP progresses, we recommend a precautionary approach to waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration and maintenance of enough of the ponds within the project footprint to provide a variety of salinity and water levels suitable for many different guilds. Special consideration should be given to birds that traditionally prefer medium to high salinity ponds, such as phalaropes and Eared Grebes, since restoration activities have already reduced the prevalence of these habitat conditions and the remaining high salinity habitat is managed for salt production rather than waterbird needs. Creating or maintaining islands or undisturbed levees will provide additional nesting and roosting habitat for other guilds. As the restoration advances, continued monitoring of avian use of Cargill-managed and SBSPRP ponds will be valuable in assessing progress toward the management target of maintaining baseline waterbird numbers.

However, a regional perspective will be needed to tease apart drivers of waterbird use in the project area. With more than a decade of bird and water quality monitoring data available, a useful next step will be to model bird habitat use and to use the model to predict the impact of future restoration scenarios on bird abundance.

Author(s)
Date
2022-10
Associated File(s)
Download Document PDF - 2022_salt_pond_annual_final_report_sept_to_may.pdf (6.78 MB)